Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) vs Iceriver KS0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) | Specification | Iceriver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| 9.4 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 100.0 GH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 65 W |
| 372.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 650.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 17.7 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 222 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)
Iceriver KS0
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 9300% more hashrate (9.4 vs 0.1 TH/s). That said, the Iceriver KS0 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) and Iceriver KS0 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) 9300% more hashrate (9.4 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS0 98% better power draw (3,500.0 vs 65.0 W)
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) 43% better efficacité (372 vs 650 J/TH)
- Iceriver KS0 86% better weight (17.7 vs 2.5 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) 5284% more heat output (11,942 vs 222 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KS0 64% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) | Metric | Iceriver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$8.06 | Daily net profit | -$0.15 |
| -$5,443 | Net after 1 year | -$56 |
| -$8,385 | Net after 2 years | -$111 |
| -$11,328 | Net after 3 years | -$167 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS0Score: 36/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)372.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) or the Iceriver KS0?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-8.06/day for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) or the Iceriver KS0 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) vs Iceriver KS0: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver KS0 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) and Iceriver KS0 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) runs at 372.3 J/TH while the Iceriver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH — a difference of 277.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 43% better efficacité (372 vs 650 J/TH).