Antminer KS3 vs IceRiver KS0 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer KS3 | Specification | IceRiver KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 9.4 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 200.0 GH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 100 W |
| 372.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 500.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer KS3
IceRiver KS0 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,223 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer KS3 edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 4600% more hashrate (9.4 vs 0.2 TH/s). That said, the IceRiver KS0 Pro isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer KS3 and IceRiver KS0 Pro actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer KS3 4600% more hashrate (9.4 vs 0.2 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 97% better power draw (3,500 vs 100 W)
- Antminer KS3 26% better efficacité (372 vs 500 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 53% better noise (75.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 84% better weight (16.1 vs 2.5 kg)
- Antminer KS3 3400% more heat output (11,942 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 97% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer KS3 | Metric | IceRiver KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $8,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $199 |
| -$8.06 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$10,942 | Net after 1 year | -$284 |
| -$13,885 | Net after 2 years | -$369 |
| -$16,827 | Net after 3 years | -$454 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS0 ProScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer KS3372.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer KS3 vs IceRiver KS0 Pro: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS0 Pro is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-8.06/day for the Antminer KS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer KS3 or the IceRiver KS0 Pro better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The IceRiver KS0 Pro is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Antminer KS3 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer KS3 vs IceRiver KS0 Pro: which fits a residential setup better?
The IceRiver KS0 Pro scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Antminer KS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer KS3 and IceRiver KS0 Pro?
The Antminer KS3 runs at 372.3 J/TH while the IceRiver KS0 Pro runs at 500.0 J/TH — a difference of 127.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 26% better efficacité (372 vs 500 J/TH).