Antminer KS3 vs Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer KS3 | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE |
|---|---|---|
| 9.4 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 500 W |
| 372.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 5.0 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer KS3
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE
Based on BTC price of $78,223 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 86% better power draw (3,500 vs 500 W). That said, the Antminer KS3 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer KS3 and Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer KS3 370% more hashrate (9.4 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 86% better power draw (3,500 vs 500 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 33% better efficacité (372 vs 250 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 40% better noise (75.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 69% better weight (16.1 vs 5.0 kg)
- Antminer KS3 600% more heat output (11,942 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 72% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer KS3 | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE |
|---|---|---|
| $8,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $458 |
| -$8.06 | Daily net profit | -$1.13 |
| -$10,942 | Net after 1 year | -$870 |
| -$13,885 | Net after 2 years | -$1,281 |
| -$16,827 | Net after 3 years | -$1,693 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITEScore: 62/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer KS3 or Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE is more profitable at $-1.13/day compared to $-8.06/day for the Antminer KS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer KS3 vs Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Antminer KS3 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer KS3 or Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE?
The Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Antminer KS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer KS3 vs Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer KS3 runs at 372.3 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 122.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 33% better efficacité (372 vs 250 J/TH).