Antminer KS5 vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer KS5 | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 20.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 200.0 GH/s |
| 3,000 W | Consommation électrique | 100 W |
| 150.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 500.0 J/TH |
| 76 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 15.8 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 10,236 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer KS5
Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer KS5, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 9900% more hashrate (20.0 vs 0.2 TH/s) in the Antminer KS5's favour. The Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer KS5 and Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer KS5 9900% more hashrate (20.0 vs 0.2 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 97% better power draw (3,000 vs 100 W)
- Antminer KS5 70% better efficacité (150 vs 500 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 84% better weight (15.8 vs 2.5 kg)
- Antminer KS5 2900% more heat output (10,236 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 24% more score de minage domestique (29.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer KS5 | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $12,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $79 |
| -$6.48 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$14,365 | Net after 1 year | -$164 |
| -$16,730 | Net after 2 years | -$249 |
| -$19,095 | Net after 3 years | -$334 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS0 ProScore: 36/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer KS5150.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer KS5 or the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-6.48/day for the Antminer KS5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer KS5 or the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer KS5 is quieter at 76 dB compared to the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer KS5 or Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Antminer KS5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer KS5 and Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro on J/TH?
The Antminer KS5 runs at 150.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro runs at 500.0 J/TH — a difference of 350.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 70% better efficacité (150 vs 500 J/TH).