Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) vs Goldshell X5S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) | Specification | Goldshell X5S |
|---|---|---|
| 504.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.4 GH/s |
| 800 W | Consommation électrique | 1,850 W |
| 1,587,301.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,360,294.1 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 4,400.0 kg | Weight | 5,200.0 kg |
| 2,730 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,312 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh)
Goldshell X5S
Based on BTC price of $78,200 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
The Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) and Goldshell X5S finish in a near dead heat in our weighted scoring. There is no wrong answer here — let your electricity rate, noise tolerance and budget break the tie using the breakdowns above.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) and Goldshell X5S sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell X5S 170% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) 57% better power draw (800 vs 1,850 W)
- Goldshell X5S 14% better efficacité (1,587,302 vs 1,360,294 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) 15% better weight (4,400 vs 5,200 kg)
- Goldshell X5S 131% more heat output (2,730 vs 6,312 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) 7% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) | Metric | Goldshell X5S |
|---|---|---|
| $165 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$1.92 | Daily net profit | -$4.44 |
| -$866 | Net after 1 year | -$1,621 |
| -$1,567 | Net after 2 years | -$3,241 |
| -$2,267 | Net after 3 years | -$4,862 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh)Score: 30/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell X5S1,360,294.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) vs Goldshell X5S: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) is more profitable at $-1.92/day compared to $-4.44/day for the Goldshell X5S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) vs Goldshell X5S: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) or Goldshell X5S?
The Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell X5S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) and Goldshell X5S on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) runs at 1,587,301.6 J/TH while the Goldshell X5S runs at 1,360,294.1 J/TH — a difference of 227,007.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 14% better efficacité (1,587,302 vs 1,360,294 J/TH).