Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 504.0 MH/s |
| 2,200 W | Consommation électrique | 800 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,587,301.6 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 4,400.0 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,730 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh)
Based on BTC price of $78,209 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer E9 Pro edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 630% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) holds the edge in consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer E9 Pro and Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer E9 Pro 630% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) 64% better power draw (2,200 vs 800 W)
- Antminer E9 Pro 62% better efficacité (597,826 vs 1,587,302 J/TH)
- Antminer E9 Pro 100% better weight (14.2 vs 4,400.0 kg)
- Antminer E9 Pro 175% more heat output (7,506 vs 2,730 BTU/hr)
- Antminer E9 Pro 33% more score de minage domestique (40.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $165 |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$1.92 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$866 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$1,567 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$2,267 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer E9 ProScore: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer E9 Pro597,826.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer E9 Pro or the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) is more profitable at $-1.92/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer E9 Pro or the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer E9 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer E9 Pro or the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh)?
The Antminer E9 Pro scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer E9 Pro and Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) on J/TH?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer L3+ (504Mh) runs at 1,587,301.6 J/TH — a difference of 989,475.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 62% better efficacité (597,826 vs 1,587,302 J/TH).