Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh)
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) vs Elphapex DG Home 1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) | Specification | Elphapex DG Home 1 |
|---|---|---|
| 596.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 2,100.0 MH/s |
| 1,050 W | Consommation électrique | 630 W |
| 1,761,745.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 300,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 4,600.0 kg | Weight | 10.3 kg |
| 3,583 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,150 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 58/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Elphapex |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh)
Elphapex DG Home 1
Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Elphapex DG Home 1 comes out ahead — it takes 6 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 83% better efficacité (1,761,745 vs 300,000 J/TH) in the Elphapex DG Home 1's favour. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) and Elphapex DG Home 1 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Elphapex DG Home 1 252% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Elphapex DG Home 1 40% better power draw (1,050 vs 630 W)
- Elphapex DG Home 1 83% better efficacité (1,761,745 vs 300,000 J/TH)
- Elphapex DG Home 1 100% better weight (4,600.0 vs 10.3 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) 67% more heat output (3,583 vs 2,150 BTU/hr)
- Elphapex DG Home 1 87% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 58.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) | Metric | Elphapex DG Home 1 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,190 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,500 |
| -$2.52 | Daily net profit | -$1.51 |
| -$2,110 | Net after 1 year | -$3,052 |
| -$3,030 | Net after 2 years | -$3,604 |
| -$3,949 | Net after 3 years | -$4,156 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Elphapex DG Home 1Score: 58/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Elphapex DG Home 1300,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) vs Elphapex DG Home 1: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Elphapex DG Home 1 is more profitable at $-1.51/day compared to $-2.52/day for the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) or the Elphapex DG Home 1 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Elphapex DG Home 1 is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) vs Elphapex DG Home 1: which fits a residential setup better?
The Elphapex DG Home 1 scores 58/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) vs Elphapex DG Home 1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (596Mh) runs at 1,761,745.0 J/TH while the Elphapex DG Home 1 runs at 300,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,461,745.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 83% better efficacité (1,761,745 vs 300,000 J/TH).