Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) vs FluMiner L2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) | Specification | FluMiner L2 |
|---|---|---|
| 17.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.0 GH/s |
| 3,570 W | Consommation électrique | 230 W |
| 210,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 230,000.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 40 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | — |
| 12,181 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 785 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 66/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | FluMiner |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh)
FluMiner L2
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 1600% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the FluMiner L2 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) and FluMiner L2 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) 1600% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- FluMiner L2 94% better power draw (3,570 vs 230 W)
- Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) 9% better efficacité (210,000 vs 230,000 J/TH)
- FluMiner L2 47% better noise (75.0 vs 40.0 dB)
- Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) 1452% more heat output (12,181 vs 785 BTU/hr)
- FluMiner L2 120% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 66.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) | Metric | FluMiner L2 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,380 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $331 |
| -$8.57 | Daily net profit | -$0.55 |
| -$6,507 | Net after 1 year | -$533 |
| -$9,634 | Net after 2 years | -$734 |
| -$12,761 | Net after 3 years | -$936 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
FluMiner L2Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh)210,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) vs FluMiner L2: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the FluMiner L2 is more profitable at $-0.55/day compared to $-8.57/day for the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) or the FluMiner L2 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The FluMiner L2 is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) or FluMiner L2?
The FluMiner L2 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) and FluMiner L2 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) runs at 210,000.0 J/TH while the FluMiner L2 runs at 230,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 20,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 9% better efficacité (210,000 vs 230,000 J/TH).