Bitmain Antminer R4 vs Canaan Avalon A16
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer R4 | Specification | Canaan Avalon A16 |
|---|---|---|
| 8.7 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 282.0 TH/s |
| 845 W | Consommation électrique | 3,900 W |
| 97.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 13.8 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 2,500.0 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 2,883 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 13,307 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer R4
Canaan Avalon A16
Based on BTC price of $78,128 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Canaan Avalon A16 edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 3141% more hashrate (8.7 vs 282.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer R4 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer R4 and Canaan Avalon A16 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Canaan Avalon A16 3141% more hashrate (8.7 vs 282.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer R4 78% better power draw (845 vs 3,900 W)
- Canaan Avalon A16 86% better efficacité (97.1 vs 13.8 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon A16 99% better weight (2,500.0 vs 14.9 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A16 362% more heat output (2,883 vs 13,307 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon A16 7% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer R4 | Metric | Canaan Avalon A16 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,202 |
| -$1.72 | Daily net profit | $0.78 |
| -$626 | Net after 1 year | -$3,918 |
| -$1,252 | Net after 2 years | -$3,633 |
| -$1,878 | Net after 3 years | -$3,349 |
| — | Payback period | Takes ~14.8 years to pay back at current rates |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Canaan Avalon A16$2.49/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon A16Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A1613.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer R4 or Canaan Avalon A16 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A16 is more profitable at $0.78/day compared to $-1.72/day for the Bitmain Antminer R4. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer R4 or the Canaan Avalon A16 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Canaan Avalon A16 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer R4 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer R4 or the Canaan Avalon A16?
The Canaan Avalon A16 scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer R4). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer R4 and Canaan Avalon A16 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer R4 runs at 97.1 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A16 runs at 13.8 J/TH — a difference of 83.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 86% better efficacité (97.1 vs 13.8 J/TH).