Avalon A1446 vs Canaan Avalon A16
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Canaan Avalon A16 is the stronger pick — it leads on 3 of 4 head-to-head factors. The Avalon A1446 runs 135.0 TH/s at 24.5 J/TH; the Canaan Avalon A16 runs 282.0 TH/s at 13.8 J/TH.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1446 | Specification | Canaan Avalon A16 |
|---|---|---|
| 135.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 282.0 TH/s |
| 3,310 W | Consommation électrique | 3,900 W |
| 24.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 13.8 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 12.8 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 11,294 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 13,307 BTU/hr |
| 8/100 | Home Mining Score | 8/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1446
Canaan Avalon A16
Based on BTC price of $64,845 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan Avalon A16 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 109% more hashrate (135 vs 282 TH/s). The Avalon A1446 claws back ground on consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Avalon A1446 and Canaan Avalon A16 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Canaan Avalon A16 109% more hashrate (135 vs 282 TH/s)
- Avalon A1446 15% better power draw (3,310 vs 3,900 W)
- Canaan Avalon A16 44% better efficacité (24.5 vs 13.8 J/TH)
- Avalon A1446 14% better weight (12.8 vs 14.9 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A16 18% more heat output (11,294 vs 13,307 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Avalon A1446 | Metric | Canaan Avalon A16 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,202 |
| -$3.54 | Daily net profit | -$0.16 |
| -$4,492 | Net after 1 year | -$4,260 |
| -$5,784 | Net after 2 years | -$4,318 |
| -$7,075 | Net after 3 years | -$4,376 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A1613.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Is the Avalon A1446 or Canaan Avalon A16 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A16 is more profitable at $-0.16/day compared to $-3.54/day for the Avalon A1446. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Avalon A1446 or Canaan Avalon A16?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Avalon A1446 vs Canaan Avalon A16: which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the Avalon A1446 and Canaan Avalon A16 on J/TH?
The Avalon A1446 runs at 24.5 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A16 runs at 13.8 J/TH — a difference of 10.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 44% better efficacité (24.5 vs 13.8 J/TH).