Avalon A1366 vs Canaan Avalon A16
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Canaan Avalon A16 is the stronger pick — it leads on 3 of 4 head-to-head factors. The Avalon A1366 runs 130.0 TH/s at 25 J/TH; the Canaan Avalon A16 runs 282.0 TH/s at 13.8 J/TH.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1366 | Specification | Canaan Avalon A16 |
|---|---|---|
| 130.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 282.0 TH/s |
| 3,250 W | Consommation électrique | 3,900 W |
| 25.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 13.8 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 12.6 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 13,307 BTU/hr |
| 8/100 | Home Mining Score | 8/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1366
Canaan Avalon A16
Based on BTC price of $64,886 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan Avalon A16 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 117% more hashrate (130 vs 282 TH/s). The Avalon A1366 claws back ground on consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Avalon A1366 and Canaan Avalon A16 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Canaan Avalon A16 117% more hashrate (130 vs 282 TH/s)
- Avalon A1366 17% better power draw (3,250 vs 3,900 W)
- Canaan Avalon A16 45% better efficacité (25.0 vs 13.8 J/TH)
- Avalon A1366 15% better weight (12.6 vs 14.9 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A16 20% more heat output (11,089 vs 13,307 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Avalon A1366 | Metric | Canaan Avalon A16 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,202 |
| -$3.56 | Daily net profit | -$0.15 |
| -$4,798 | Net after 1 year | -$4,258 |
| -$6,096 | Net after 2 years | -$4,314 |
| -$7,393 | Net after 3 years | -$4,369 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A1613.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Avalon A1366 vs Canaan Avalon A16: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A16 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-3.56/day for the Avalon A1366. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Avalon A1366 vs Canaan Avalon A16: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Avalon A1366 or the Canaan Avalon A16?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the Avalon A1366 and Canaan Avalon A16 on J/TH?
The Avalon A1366 runs at 25.0 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A16 runs at 13.8 J/TH — a difference of 11.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 45% better efficacité (25.0 vs 13.8 J/TH).