Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Avalon A1366

Avalon A1366

Taux de hachage 130.0 TH/s Puissance 3,250 W Efficiency 25.0 J/TH
VS
Canaan Avalon A16

Canaan Avalon A16

Taux de hachage 282.0 TH/s Puissance 3,900 W Efficiency 13.8 J/TH

Avalon A1366 vs Canaan Avalon A16

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Avalon A1366 Specification Canaan Avalon A16
130.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 282.0 TH/s
3,250 W Consommation électrique 3,900 W
25.0 J/TH Efficiency 13.8 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit 75 dB
12.6 kg Weight 14.9 kg
11,089 BTU/hr BTU Output 13,307 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer Canaan

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Avalon A1366

Daily Revenue 0.00005982 BTC $4.68
Daily Electricity -$7.80
Daily Profit -$3.12
Monthly -$93.70
Yearly -$1,139.99

Canaan Avalon A16

Daily Revenue 0.00012977 BTC $10.14
Daily Electricity -$9.36
Daily Profit $0.78
Monthly $23.55
Yearly $286.49

Based on BTC price of $78,175 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan Avalon A16 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 117% more hashrate (130 vs 282 TH/s). The Avalon A1366 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Canaan Avalon A16 — l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Avalon A1366 and Canaan Avalon A16 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Canaan Avalon A16 117% more hashrate (130 vs 282 TH/s)
  • Avalon A1366 17% better power draw (3,250 vs 3,900 W)
  • Canaan Avalon A16 45% better efficacité (25.0 vs 13.8 J/TH)
  • Avalon A1366 15% better weight (12.6 vs 14.9 kg)
  • Canaan Avalon A16 20% more heat output (11,089 vs 13,307 BTU/hr)
  • Avalon A1366 20% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 30.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Avalon A1366 Metric Canaan Avalon A16
$3,500 Upfront cost (MSRP) $4,202
-$3.12 Daily net profit $0.78
-$4,640 Net after 1 year -$3,916
-$5,780 Net after 2 years -$3,629
-$6,920 Net after 3 years -$3,343
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Takes ~14.7 years to pay back at current rates

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Canaan Avalon A16

$3.91/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

Avalon A1366

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Canaan Avalon A16

13.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Avalon A1366 vs Canaan Avalon A16: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A16 is more profitable at $0.78/day compared to $-3.12/day for the Avalon A1366. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Avalon A1366 vs Canaan Avalon A16: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Avalon A1366 or the Canaan Avalon A16?

The Avalon A1366 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Canaan Avalon A16). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Avalon A1366 and Canaan Avalon A16 on J/TH?

The Avalon A1366 runs at 25.0 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A16 runs at 13.8 J/TH — a difference of 11.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 45% better efficacité (25.0 vs 13.8 J/TH).