Avalon A1566 vs Canaan Avalon A16
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Canaan Avalon A16 is the stronger pick — it leads on 3 of 4 head-to-head factors. The Avalon A1566 runs 185.0 TH/s at 18.5 J/TH; the Canaan Avalon A16 runs 282.0 TH/s at 13.8 J/TH.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1566 | Specification | Canaan Avalon A16 |
|---|---|---|
| 185.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 282.0 TH/s |
| 3,420 W | Consommation électrique | 3,900 W |
| 18.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 13.8 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.9 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 11,669 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 13,307 BTU/hr |
| 8/100 | Home Mining Score | 8/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1566
Canaan Avalon A16
Based on BTC price of $64,886 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan Avalon A16 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 52% more hashrate (185 vs 282 TH/s). The Avalon A1566 holds the edge in consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Avalon A1566 and Canaan Avalon A16 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Canaan Avalon A16 52% more hashrate (185 vs 282 TH/s)
- Avalon A1566 12% better power draw (3,420 vs 3,900 W)
- Canaan Avalon A16 25% better efficacité (18.5 vs 13.8 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon A16 14% more heat output (11,669 vs 13,307 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Avalon A1566 | Metric | Canaan Avalon A16 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,202 |
| -$2.17 | Daily net profit | -$0.15 |
| -$6,291 | Net after 1 year | -$4,258 |
| -$7,083 | Net after 2 years | -$4,314 |
| -$7,874 | Net after 3 years | -$4,369 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A1613.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Which makes more money, the Avalon A1566 or the Canaan Avalon A16?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A16 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-2.17/day for the Avalon A1566. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Avalon A1566 or the Canaan Avalon A16 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Avalon A1566 vs Canaan Avalon A16: which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the Avalon A1566 and Canaan Avalon A16 on J/TH?
The Avalon A1566 runs at 18.5 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A16 runs at 13.8 J/TH — a difference of 4.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 25% better efficacité (18.5 vs 13.8 J/TH).