Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 |
|---|---|---|
| 28.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 150.0 TH/s |
| 1,596 W | Consommation électrique | 3,230 W |
| 57.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 21.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 7,000.0 kg | Weight | 13.0 kg |
| 5,446 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,021 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th)
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466
Based on BTC price of $78,067 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 436% more hashrate (28.0 vs 150.0 TH/s) in the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466's favour. The Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 436% more hashrate (28.0 vs 150.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) 51% better power draw (1,596 vs 3,230 W)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 62% better efficacité (57.0 vs 21.5 J/TH)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 100% better weight (7,000.0 vs 13.0 kg)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 102% more heat output (5,446 vs 11,021 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) 27% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,599 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $937 |
| -$2.82 | Daily net profit | -$2.36 |
| -$6,630 | Net after 1 year | -$1,800 |
| -$7,661 | Net after 2 years | -$2,662 |
| -$8,692 | Net after 3 years | -$3,525 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th)Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A146621.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) or Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 is more profitable at $-2.36/day compared to $-2.82/day for the Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) or Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) or the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466?
The Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) runs at 57.0 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1466 runs at 21.5 J/TH — a difference of 35.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 62% better efficacité (57.0 vs 21.5 J/TH).