Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer D9 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 1,770.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 28.0 TH/s |
| 2,839 W | Consommation électrique | 1,596 W |
| 1,604.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 57.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 7,000.0 kg |
| 9,687 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,446 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer D9
Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,236 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th), which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 96% better efficacité (1,604.0 vs 57.0 J/TH). That said, the Antminer D9 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer D9 and Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) 1482% more hashrate (1.8 vs 28.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) 44% better power draw (2,839 vs 1,596 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) 96% better efficacité (1,604.0 vs 57.0 J/TH)
- Antminer D9 100% better weight (16.1 vs 7,000.0 kg)
- Antminer D9 78% more heat output (9,687 vs 5,446 BTU/hr)
- Antminer D9 29% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer D9 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,599 |
| -$6.75 | Daily net profit | -$2.82 |
| -$5,464 | Net after 1 year | -$6,629 |
| -$7,927 | Net after 2 years | -$7,659 |
| -$10,391 | Net after 3 years | -$8,689 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer D9Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th)57.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) is more profitable at $-2.82/day compared to $-6.75/day for the Antminer D9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer D9 or the Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer D9 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer D9 or Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th)?
The Antminer D9 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer D9 and Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th)?
The Antminer D9 runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S15 (28Th) runs at 57.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,547.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 96% better efficacité (1,604.0 vs 57.0 J/TH).