Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M72
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) | Specification | MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 |
|---|---|---|
| 56.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 262.0 TH/s |
| 2,520 W | Consommation électrique | 3,799 W |
| 45.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 14.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 9,500.0 kg | Weight | 25.5 kg |
| 8,598 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,962 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th)
MicroBT WhatsMiner M72
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 368% more hashrate (56.0 vs 262.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) holds the edge in consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) and MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 368% more hashrate (56.0 vs 262.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) 34% better power draw (2,520 vs 3,799 W)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 68% better efficacité (45.0 vs 14.5 J/TH)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 100% better weight (9,500.0 vs 25.5 kg)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 51% more heat output (8,598 vs 12,962 BTU/hr)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 36% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) | Metric | MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 |
|---|---|---|
| $413 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$4.03 | Daily net profit | $0.31 |
| -$1,885 | Net after 1 year | +$114 |
| -$3,357 | Net after 2 years | +$228 |
| -$4,829 | Net after 3 years | +$341 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
MicroBT WhatsMiner M72$4.34/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
MicroBT WhatsMiner M72Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT WhatsMiner M7214.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 is more profitable at $0.31/day compared to $-4.03/day for the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) or MicroBT WhatsMiner M72?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) or MicroBT WhatsMiner M72?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) and MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) runs at 45.0 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 runs at 14.5 J/TH — a difference of 30.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 68% better efficacité (45.0 vs 14.5 J/TH).