MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M72
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10S | Specification | MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 |
|---|---|---|
| 55.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 262.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 3,799 W |
| 63.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 14.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 10.7 kg | Weight | 25.5 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,962 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S
MicroBT WhatsMiner M72
Based on BTC price of $64,340 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 376% more hashrate (55.0 vs 262.0 TH/s). That said, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10S and MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 376% more hashrate (55.0 vs 262.0 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10S 8% better power draw (3,500 vs 3,799 W)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 77% better efficacité (63.6 vs 14.5 J/TH)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10S 58% better weight (10.7 vs 25.5 kg)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 9% more heat output (11,942 vs 12,962 BTU/hr)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 36% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10S | Metric | MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$6.80 | Daily net profit | -$1.49 |
| -$6,282 | Net after 1 year | -$544 |
| -$8,763 | Net after 2 years | -$1,089 |
| -$11,245 | Net after 3 years | -$1,633 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
MicroBT WhatsMiner M72Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT WhatsMiner M7214.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M72: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 is more profitable at $-1.49/day compared to $-6.80/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S or MicroBT WhatsMiner M72?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M72: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10S runs at 63.6 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 runs at 14.5 J/TH — a difference of 49.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 77% better efficacité (63.6 vs 14.5 J/TH).