Antminer S17+ vs Canaan Avalon Q
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S17+ | Specification | Canaan Avalon Q |
|---|---|---|
| 73.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 90.0 TH/s |
| 2,920 W | Consommation électrique | 1,674 W |
| 40.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.6 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 9.5 kg | Weight | 10.5 kg |
| 9,963 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,712 BTU/hr |
| 84/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S17+
Canaan Avalon Q
Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Canaan Avalon Q l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 54% better efficacité (40.0 vs 18.6 J/TH). The Antminer S17+ holds the edge in score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer S17+ and Canaan Avalon Q sit on each measurable spec:
- Canaan Avalon Q 23% more hashrate (73.0 vs 90.0 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon Q 43% better power draw (2,920 vs 1,674 W)
- Canaan Avalon Q 54% better efficacité (40.0 vs 18.6 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon Q 40% better noise (75.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Antminer S17+ 10% better weight (9.5 vs 10.5 kg)
- Antminer S17+ 74% more heat output (9,963 vs 5,712 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S17+ 50% more score de minage domestique (84.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer S17+ | Metric | Canaan Avalon Q |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,292 |
| -$4.38 | Daily net profit | -$0.78 |
| -$1,599 | Net after 1 year | -$1,575 |
| -$3,197 | Net after 2 years | -$1,859 |
| -$4,796 | Net after 3 years | -$2,143 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S17+Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon Q18.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer S17+ vs Canaan Avalon Q: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Q is more profitable at $-0.78/day compared to $-4.38/day for the Antminer S17+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer S17+ or Canaan Avalon Q?
The Canaan Avalon Q is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Antminer S17+ at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer S17+ vs Canaan Avalon Q: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer S17+ scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 56/100 for the Canaan Avalon Q). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer S17+ and Canaan Avalon Q on J/TH?
The Antminer S17+ runs at 40.0 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon Q runs at 18.6 J/TH — a difference of 21.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 54% better efficacité (40.0 vs 18.6 J/TH).