Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) vs Whatsminer M50S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) | Specification | Whatsminer M50S |
|---|---|---|
| 50.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 126.0 TH/s |
| 1,975 W | Consommation électrique | 3,276 W |
| 39.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 26.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 9,500.0 kg | Weight | 12.8 kg |
| 6,739 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,178 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th)
Whatsminer M50S
Based on BTC price of $78,175 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Whatsminer M50S, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 152% more hashrate (50.0 vs 126.0 TH/s) in the Whatsminer M50S's favour. The Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) claws back ground on consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) and Whatsminer M50S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Whatsminer M50S 152% more hashrate (50.0 vs 126.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) 40% better power draw (1,975 vs 3,276 W)
- Whatsminer M50S 34% better efficacité (39.5 vs 26.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M50S 100% better weight (9,500.0 vs 12.8 kg)
- Whatsminer M50S 66% more heat output (6,739 vs 11,178 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M50S 29% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) | Metric | Whatsminer M50S |
|---|---|---|
| $413 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,200 |
| -$2.94 | Daily net profit | -$3.33 |
| -$1,487 | Net after 1 year | -$4,415 |
| -$2,560 | Net after 2 years | -$5,631 |
| -$3,634 | Net after 3 years | -$6,846 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M50SScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M50S26.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) vs Whatsminer M50S: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) is more profitable at $-2.94/day compared to $-3.33/day for the Whatsminer M50S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) vs Whatsminer M50S: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Whatsminer M50S is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) or Whatsminer M50S?
The Whatsminer M50S scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) vs Whatsminer M50S: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (50Th) runs at 39.5 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50S runs at 26.0 J/TH — a difference of 13.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 34% better efficacité (39.5 vs 26.0 J/TH).