MicroBT Whatsminer D1 vs Whatsminer M50S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Whatsminer M50S is the stronger pick — it leads on 3 of 5 head-to-head factors. The MicroBT Whatsminer D1 runs 48.0 TH/s; the Whatsminer M50S runs 126.0 TH/s.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer D1 | Specification | Whatsminer M50S |
|---|---|---|
| 48.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 126.0 TH/s |
| 2,200 W | Consommation électrique | 3,276 W |
| 45.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 26.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 8.5 kg | Weight | 12.8 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,178 BTU/hr |
| 11/100 | Home Mining Score | 8/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake256r14 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer D1
Whatsminer M50S
Based on BTC price of $65,075 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Whatsminer M50S l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 163% more hashrate (48.0 vs 126.0 TH/s). The MicroBT Whatsminer D1 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The MicroBT Whatsminer D1 and Whatsminer M50S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Whatsminer M50S 163% more hashrate (48.0 vs 126.0 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer D1 33% better power draw (2,200 vs 3,276 W)
- Whatsminer M50S 43% better efficacité (45.8 vs 26.0 J/TH)
- MicroBT Whatsminer D1 34% better weight (8.5 vs 12.8 kg)
- Whatsminer M50S 49% more heat output (7,506 vs 11,178 BTU/hr)
- MicroBT Whatsminer D1 38% more score de minage domestique (11.0 vs 8.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| MicroBT Whatsminer D1 | Metric | Whatsminer M50S |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,200 |
| -$3.71 | Daily net profit | -$3.74 |
| -$1,354 | Net after 1 year | -$4,564 |
| -$2,707 | Net after 2 years | -$5,928 |
| -$4,061 | Net after 3 years | -$7,292 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
MicroBT Whatsminer D1Score: 11/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M50S26.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
MicroBT Whatsminer D1 vs Whatsminer M50S: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT Whatsminer D1 is more profitable at $-3.71/day compared to $-3.74/day for the Whatsminer M50S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
MicroBT Whatsminer D1 vs Whatsminer M50S: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Whatsminer M50S is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer D1 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the MicroBT Whatsminer D1 or the Whatsminer M50S?
The MicroBT Whatsminer D1 scores 11/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 8/100 for the Whatsminer M50S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the MicroBT Whatsminer D1 and Whatsminer M50S on J/TH?
The MicroBT Whatsminer D1 runs at 45.8 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50S runs at 26.0 J/TH — a difference of 19.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 43% better efficacité (45.8 vs 26.0 J/TH).