MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs Whatsminer M50S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Whatsminer M50S is the stronger pick — it leads on 4 of 6 head-to-head factors. The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 runs 33.0 TH/s at 65 J/TH; the Whatsminer M50S runs 126.0 TH/s at 26 J/TH.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10 | Specification | Whatsminer M50S |
|---|---|---|
| 33.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 126.0 TH/s |
| 2,145 W | Consommation électrique | 3,276 W |
| 65.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 26.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 8.6 kg | Weight | 12.8 kg |
| 7,319 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,178 BTU/hr |
| 11/100 | Home Mining Score | 8/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer M10
Whatsminer M50S
Based on BTC price of $65,917 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Whatsminer M50S l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 282% more hashrate (33.0 vs 126.0 TH/s). The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 and Whatsminer M50S actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Whatsminer M50S 282% more hashrate (33.0 vs 126.0 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 35% better power draw (2,145 vs 3,276 W)
- Whatsminer M50S 60% better efficacité (65.0 vs 26.0 J/TH)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 33% better weight (8.6 vs 12.8 kg)
- Whatsminer M50S 53% more heat output (7,319 vs 11,178 BTU/hr)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 38% more score de minage domestique (11.0 vs 8.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10 | Metric | Whatsminer M50S |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,200 |
| -$4.05 | Daily net profit | -$3.68 |
| -$3,980 | Net after 1 year | -$4,544 |
| -$5,459 | Net after 2 years | -$5,889 |
| -$6,939 | Net after 3 years | -$7,233 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
MicroBT Whatsminer M10Score: 11/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M50S26.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs Whatsminer M50S: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M50S is more profitable at $-3.68/day compared to $-4.05/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 or the Whatsminer M50S better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Whatsminer M50S is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs Whatsminer M50S: which fits a residential setup better?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 scores 11/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 8/100 for the Whatsminer M50S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 and Whatsminer M50S on J/TH?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 runs at 65.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50S runs at 26.0 J/TH — a difference of 39.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 60% better efficacité (65.0 vs 26.0 J/TH).