Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) vs Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 53.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 12.5 TH/s |
| 2,094 W | Consommation électrique | 1,225 W |
| 39.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 98.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 9,500.0 kg | Weight | 4,200.0 kg |
| 7,145 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,180 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th)
Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,071 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) l'emporte sur 2 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 324% more hashrate (53.0 vs 12.5 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) and Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) 324% more hashrate (53.0 vs 12.5 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) 41% better power draw (2,094 vs 1,225 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) 60% better efficacité (39.5 vs 98.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) 56% better weight (9,500 vs 4,200 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) 71% more heat output (7,145 vs 4,180 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) 19% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $780 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $65 |
| -$3.12 | Daily net profit | -$2.49 |
| -$1,919 | Net after 1 year | -$974 |
| -$3,059 | Net after 2 years | -$1,883 |
| -$4,198 | Net after 3 years | -$2,793 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th)39.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) or the Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) is more profitable at $-2.49/day compared to $-3.12/day for the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) or the Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) or Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th)?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) and Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) runs at 39.5 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) runs at 98.0 J/TH — a difference of 58.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 60% better efficacité (39.5 vs 98.0 J/TH).