Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer AL1 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 12.5 TH/s |
| 3,360 W | Consommation électrique | 1,225 W |
| 210.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 98.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.5 kg | Weight | 4,200.0 kg |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,180 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer AL1
Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,171 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th), which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 64% better power draw (3,360 vs 1,225 W). That said, the Antminer AL1 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer AL1 28% more hashrate (16.0 vs 12.5 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) 64% better power draw (3,360 vs 1,225 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) 53% better efficacité (210.0 vs 98.0 J/TH)
- Antminer AL1 100% better weight (14.5 vs 4,200.0 kg)
- Antminer AL1 174% more heat output (11,464 vs 4,180 BTU/hr)
- Antminer AL1 16% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer AL1 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $65 |
| -$7.49 | Daily net profit | -$2.49 |
| -$12,733 | Net after 1 year | -$974 |
| -$15,467 | Net after 2 years | -$1,883 |
| -$18,200 | Net after 3 years | -$2,792 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer AL1Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th)98.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer AL1 or the Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) is more profitable at $-2.49/day compared to $-7.49/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer AL1 or the Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer AL1 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th): which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer AL1 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S9 (12.5Th) runs at 98.0 J/TH — a difference of 112.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 53% better efficacité (210.0 vs 98.0 J/TH).