Antminer S19 XP Hyd vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S19 XP Hyd | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 255.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 68.0 TH/s |
| 5,304 W | Consommation électrique | 3,420 W |
| 20.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 50.3 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 13.1 kg | Weight | 11,200.0 kg |
| 18,097 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,669 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S19 XP Hyd
Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,163 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Antminer S19 XP Hyd comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 275% more hashrate (255.0 vs 68.0 TH/s) in the Antminer S19 XP Hyd's favour. The Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro holds the edge in consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer S19 XP Hyd and Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 275% more hashrate (255.0 vs 68.0 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro 36% better power draw (5,304 vs 3,420 W)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 59% better efficacité (20.8 vs 50.3 J/TH)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 100% better weight (13.1 vs 11,200.0 kg)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 55% more heat output (18,097 vs 11,669 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 100% more score de minage domestique (44.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer S19 XP Hyd | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $6,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $519 |
| -$3.56 | Daily net profit | -$5.76 |
| -$7,798 | Net after 1 year | -$2,622 |
| -$9,097 | Net after 2 years | -$4,725 |
| -$10,395 | Net after 3 years | -$6,828 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S19 XP HydScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S19 XP Hyd20.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer S19 XP Hyd vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S19 XP Hyd is more profitable at $-3.56/day compared to $-5.76/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer S19 XP Hyd or Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro?
The Antminer S19 XP Hyd is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer S19 XP Hyd vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer S19 XP Hyd scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer S19 XP Hyd vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer S19 XP Hyd runs at 20.8 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 1126 Pro runs at 50.3 J/TH — a difference of 29.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 59% better efficacité (20.8 vs 50.3 J/TH).