Antminer K7 vs Antminer S19 XP Hyd
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Antminer S19 XP Hyd is the stronger pick — it leads on 5 of 6 head-to-head factors. The Antminer K7 runs 63.5 TH/s; the Antminer S19 XP Hyd runs 255.0 TH/s.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer K7 | Specification | Antminer S19 XP Hyd |
|---|---|---|
| 63.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 255.0 TH/s |
| 3,080 W | Consommation électrique | 5,304 W |
| 48.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 20.8 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 14.0 kg | Weight | 13.1 kg |
| 10,509 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 18,097 BTU/hr |
| 8/100 | Home Mining Score | 32/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer K7
Antminer S19 XP Hyd
Based on BTC price of $64,262 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Antminer S19 XP Hyd l'emporte sur 5 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 302% more hashrate (63.5 vs 255.0 TH/s). The Antminer K7 claws back ground on consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer K7 and Antminer S19 XP Hyd actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 302% more hashrate (63.5 vs 255.0 TH/s)
- Antminer K7 42% better power draw (3,080 vs 5,304 W)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 57% better efficacité (48.5 vs 20.8 J/TH)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 6% better weight (14.0 vs 13.1 kg)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 72% more heat output (10,509 vs 18,097 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 300% more score de minage domestique (8.0 vs 32.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer K7 | Metric | Antminer S19 XP Hyd |
|---|---|---|
| $3,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $6,500 |
| -$5.34 | Daily net profit | -$4.48 |
| -$5,449 | Net after 1 year | -$8,137 |
| -$7,397 | Net after 2 years | -$9,773 |
| -$9,346 | Net after 3 years | -$11,410 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S19 XP HydScore: 32/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S19 XP Hyd20.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Antminer K7 vs Antminer S19 XP Hyd: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S19 XP Hyd is more profitable at $-4.48/day compared to $-5.34/day for the Antminer K7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer K7 or Antminer S19 XP Hyd?
The Antminer S19 XP Hyd is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Antminer K7 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer K7 vs Antminer S19 XP Hyd: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer S19 XP Hyd scores 32/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 8/100 for the Antminer K7). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer K7 and Antminer S19 XP Hyd on J/TH?
The Antminer K7 runs at 48.5 J/TH while the Antminer S19 XP Hyd runs at 20.8 J/TH — a difference of 27.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 57% better efficacité (48.5 vs 20.8 J/TH).