Antminer D9 vs Antminer S19 XP Hyd
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Antminer S19 XP Hyd is the stronger pick — it leads on 5 of 6 head-to-head factors. The Antminer D9 runs 1,770.0 GH/s; the Antminer S19 XP Hyd runs 255.0 TH/s.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer D9 | Specification | Antminer S19 XP Hyd |
|---|---|---|
| 1,770.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 255.0 TH/s |
| 2,839 W | Consommation électrique | 5,304 W |
| 1,604.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 20.8 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 13.1 kg |
| 9,687 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 18,097 BTU/hr |
| 8/100 | Home Mining Score | 32/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer D9
Antminer S19 XP Hyd
Based on BTC price of $64,262 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Antminer S19 XP Hyd comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 14307% more hashrate (1.8 vs 255.0 TH/s). The Antminer D9 holds the edge in consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer D9 and Antminer S19 XP Hyd actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 14307% more hashrate (1.8 vs 255.0 TH/s)
- Antminer D9 46% better power draw (2,839 vs 5,304 W)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 99% better efficacité (1,604.0 vs 20.8 J/TH)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 19% better weight (16.1 vs 13.1 kg)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 87% more heat output (9,687 vs 18,097 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 300% more score de minage domestique (8.0 vs 32.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer D9 | Metric | Antminer S19 XP Hyd |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $6,500 |
| -$6.76 | Daily net profit | -$4.48 |
| -$5,466 | Net after 1 year | -$8,137 |
| -$7,932 | Net after 2 years | -$9,773 |
| -$10,398 | Net after 3 years | -$11,410 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S19 XP HydScore: 32/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S19 XP Hyd20.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Antminer D9 vs Antminer S19 XP Hyd: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S19 XP Hyd is more profitable at $-4.48/day compared to $-6.76/day for the Antminer D9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer D9 or the Antminer S19 XP Hyd better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer S19 XP Hyd is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Antminer D9 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer D9 or Antminer S19 XP Hyd?
The Antminer S19 XP Hyd scores 32/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 8/100 for the Antminer D9). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer D9 and Antminer S19 XP Hyd?
The Antminer D9 runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the Antminer S19 XP Hyd runs at 20.8 J/TH — a difference of 1,583.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficacité (1,604.0 vs 20.8 J/TH).