Antminer E9 Pro vs Antminer S19 XP Hyd
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Antminer S19 XP Hyd is the stronger pick — it leads on 5 of 6 head-to-head factors. The Antminer E9 Pro runs 3,680.0 MH/s; the Antminer S19 XP Hyd runs 255.0 TH/s.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | Antminer S19 XP Hyd |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 255.0 TH/s |
| 2,200 W | Consommation électrique | 5,304 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 20.8 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 13.1 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 18,097 BTU/hr |
| 11/100 | Home Mining Score | 32/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
Antminer S19 XP Hyd
Based on BTC price of $65,342 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer S19 XP Hyd edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 6929248% more hashrate (0.0 vs 255.0 TH/s). The Antminer E9 Pro claws back ground on consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer E9 Pro and Antminer S19 XP Hyd diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 6929248% more hashrate (0.0 vs 255.0 TH/s)
- Antminer E9 Pro 59% better power draw (2,200 vs 5,304 W)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 100% better efficacité (597,826.1 vs 20.8 J/TH)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 8% better weight (14.2 vs 13.1 kg)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 141% more heat output (7,506 vs 18,097 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S19 XP Hyd 191% more score de minage domestique (11.0 vs 32.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | Antminer S19 XP Hyd |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $6,500 |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$4.35 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$8,086 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$9,672 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$11,258 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S19 XP HydScore: 32/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S19 XP Hyd20.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Is the Antminer E9 Pro or Antminer S19 XP Hyd more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S19 XP Hyd is more profitable at $-4.35/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Antminer S19 XP Hyd: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer S19 XP Hyd is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Antminer E9 Pro at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer E9 Pro or the Antminer S19 XP Hyd?
The Antminer S19 XP Hyd scores 32/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 11/100 for the Antminer E9 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer E9 Pro and Antminer S19 XP Hyd on J/TH?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the Antminer S19 XP Hyd runs at 20.8 J/TH — a difference of 597,805.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (597,826.1 vs 20.8 J/TH).