Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) vs Bitmain Antminer S23
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S23 |
|---|---|---|
| 310.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 318.0 TH/s |
| 5,270 W | Consommation électrique | 3,498 W |
| 17.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 11.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 12.8 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 17,981 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,935 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th)
Bitmain Antminer S23
Based on BTC price of $76,998 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer S23 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Its biggest concrete edge: 35% better efficacité (17.0 vs 11.0 J/TH). That said, the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) and Bitmain Antminer S23 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer S23 3% more hashrate (310 vs 318 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 34% better power draw (5,270 vs 3,498 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 35% better efficacité (17.0 vs 11.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) 12% better weight (12.8 vs 14.5 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) 51% more heat output (17,981 vs 11,935 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 20% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S23 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,679 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,999 |
| -$1.66 | Daily net profit | $2.87 |
| -$2,286 | Net after 1 year | -$3,951 |
| -$2,894 | Net after 2 years | -$2,902 |
| -$3,501 | Net after 3 years | -$1,854 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Takes ~4.8 years to pay back at current rates |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitmain Antminer S23$4.54/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S23Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S2311.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) or Bitmain Antminer S23 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S23 is more profitable at $2.87/day compared to $-1.66/day for the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) vs Bitmain Antminer S23: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) or the Bitmain Antminer S23?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) and Bitmain Antminer S23?
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) runs at 17.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S23 runs at 11.0 J/TH — a difference of 6.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 35% better efficacité (17.0 vs 11.0 J/TH).