Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1066
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 |
|---|---|---|
| 14.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 50.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Consommation électrique | 3,250 W |
| 93.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 65.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 4,200.0 kg | Weight | 11,400.0 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,089 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th)
Canaan AvalonMiner 1066
Based on BTC price of $77,872 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 l'emporte sur 2 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 245% more hashrate (14.5 vs 50.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 245% more hashrate (14.5 vs 50.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) 58% better power draw (1,350 vs 3,250 W)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 30% better efficacité (93.1 vs 65.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) 63% better weight (4,200 vs 11,400 kg)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 141% more heat output (4,606 vs 11,089 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) 41% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 |
|---|---|---|
| $65 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,255 |
| -$2.72 | Daily net profit | -$6.01 |
| -$1,058 | Net after 1 year | -$3,448 |
| -$2,051 | Net after 2 years | -$5,641 |
| -$3,044 | Net after 3 years | -$7,834 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan AvalonMiner 106665.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1066: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) is more profitable at $-2.72/day compared to $-6.01/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) or Canaan AvalonMiner 1066?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1066: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1066: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) runs at 93.1 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 runs at 65.0 J/TH — a difference of 28.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 30% better efficacité (93.1 vs 65.0 J/TH).