Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer AL1 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 14.5 TH/s |
| 3,360 W | Consommation électrique | 1,350 W |
| 210.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 93.1 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.5 kg | Weight | 4,200.0 kg |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,606 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer AL1
Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,031 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th), which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 60% better power draw (3,360 vs 1,350 W). The Antminer AL1 claws back ground on hashrate and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer AL1 10% more hashrate (16.0 vs 14.5 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) 60% better power draw (3,360 vs 1,350 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) 56% better efficacité (210.0 vs 93.1 J/TH)
- Antminer AL1 100% better weight (14.5 vs 4,200.0 kg)
- Antminer AL1 149% more heat output (11,464 vs 4,606 BTU/hr)
- Antminer AL1 16% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer AL1 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $65 |
| -$7.49 | Daily net profit | -$2.72 |
| -$12,734 | Net after 1 year | -$1,058 |
| -$15,467 | Net after 2 years | -$2,050 |
| -$18,201 | Net after 3 years | -$3,043 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer AL1Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th)93.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer AL1 or the Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) is more profitable at $-2.72/day compared to $-7.49/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer AL1 or Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th)?
The Antminer AL1 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer AL1 or the Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th)?
The Antminer AL1 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) on J/TH?
The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S9j (14.5Th) runs at 93.1 J/TH — a difference of 116.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 56% better efficacité (210.0 vs 93.1 J/TH).