Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) vs iPollo B1L
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) | Specification | iPollo B1L |
|---|---|---|
| 11.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 58.0 TH/s |
| 1,450 W | Consommation électrique | 3,000 W |
| 126.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 51.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 3,800.0 kg | Weight | 12,700.0 kg |
| 4,947 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,236 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th)
iPollo B1L
Based on BTC price of $78,005 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the iPollo B1L, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 404% more hashrate (11.5 vs 58.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) and iPollo B1L sit on each measurable spec:
- iPollo B1L 404% more hashrate (11.5 vs 58.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) 52% better power draw (1,450 vs 3,000 W)
- iPollo B1L 59% better efficacité (126.1 vs 51.7 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) 70% better weight (3,800 vs 12,700 kg)
- iPollo B1L 107% more heat output (4,947 vs 10,236 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) 41% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) | Metric | iPollo B1L |
|---|---|---|
| $955 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $430 |
| -$3.07 | Daily net profit | -$5.12 |
| -$2,075 | Net after 1 year | -$2,298 |
| -$3,194 | Net after 2 years | -$4,166 |
| -$4,314 | Net after 3 years | -$6,034 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo B1L51.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) or iPollo B1L more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) is more profitable at $-3.07/day compared to $-5.12/day for the iPollo B1L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) vs iPollo B1L: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) vs iPollo B1L: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo B1L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) and iPollo B1L?
The Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) runs at 126.1 J/TH while the iPollo B1L runs at 51.7 J/TH — a difference of 74.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 59% better efficacité (126.1 vs 51.7 J/TH).