Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) vs GMO miner B2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) | Specification | GMO miner B2 |
|---|---|---|
| 11.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 24.0 TH/s |
| 1,450 W | Consommation électrique | 1,950 W |
| 126.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 81.3 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 3,800.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 4,947 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,653 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | GMO miner |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th)
GMO miner B2
Based on BTC price of $78,005 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the GMO miner B2, which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 109% more hashrate (11.5 vs 24.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) and GMO miner B2 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- GMO miner B2 109% more hashrate (11.5 vs 24.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) 26% better power draw (1,450 vs 1,950 W)
- GMO miner B2 36% better efficacité (126.1 vs 81.3 J/TH)
- GMO miner B2 34% more heat output (4,947 vs 6,653 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) 11% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) | Metric | GMO miner B2 |
|---|---|---|
| $955 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$3.07 | Daily net profit | -$3.82 |
| -$2,075 | Net after 1 year | -$1,394 |
| -$3,194 | Net after 2 years | -$2,787 |
| -$4,314 | Net after 3 years | -$4,181 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
GMO miner B281.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) or GMO miner B2 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) is more profitable at $-3.07/day compared to $-3.82/day for the GMO miner B2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) or GMO miner B2?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) or GMO miner B2?
The Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the GMO miner B2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) and GMO miner B2 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) runs at 126.1 J/TH while the GMO miner B2 runs at 81.3 J/TH — a difference of 44.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 36% better efficacité (126.1 vs 81.3 J/TH).