Auradine Teraflux AH3880 vs Canaan Avalon Q
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Auradine Teraflux AH3880 | Specification | Canaan Avalon Q |
|---|---|---|
| 600.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 90.0 TH/s |
| 8,700 W | Consommation électrique | 1,674 W |
| 14.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.6 J/TH |
| 60 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| — | Weight | 10.5 kg |
| 29,684 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,712 BTU/hr |
| — | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Auradine | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Auradine Teraflux AH3880
Canaan Avalon Q
Based on BTC price of $66,869 and current network difficulty as of Mar 28, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Auradine Teraflux AH3880 l'emporte sur 2 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate). Le Canaan Avalon Q a l'avantage en consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Consultez les spécifications détaillées et les calculs de rentabilité ci-dessus pour déterminer quel mineur convient le mieux à votre installation.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon QScore: 56/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Auradine Teraflux AH388014.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 or Canaan Avalon Q more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Q is more profitable at $-1.19/day compared to $-2.03/day for the Auradine Teraflux AH3880. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 or Canaan Avalon Q?
The Canaan Avalon Q is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 at 60 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 or Canaan Avalon Q?
The Canaan Avalon Q scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AH3880). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Auradine Teraflux AH3880 and Canaan Avalon Q?
The Auradine Teraflux AH3880 runs at 14.5 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon Q runs at 18.6 J/TH — a difference of 4.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.
Compare Auradine Teraflux AH3880 with...
- Auradine Teraflux AH3880 vs Auradine Teraflux AI3680
- Auradine Teraflux AH3880 vs Auradine Teraflux AT2880
- Auradine Teraflux AH3880 vs Aisen A1 Pro
- Auradine Teraflux AH3880 vs Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AH3880 vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AH3880 vs Antminer S17
