Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Canaan Avalon A16
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Auradine Teraflux AT2880 | Specification | Canaan Avalon A16 |
|---|---|---|
| 260.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 282.0 TH/s |
| 4,420 W | Consommation électrique | 3,900 W |
| 17.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 13.8 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| — | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 15,081 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 13,307 BTU/hr |
| — | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Auradine | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Auradine Teraflux AT2880
Canaan Avalon A16
Based on BTC price of $78,128 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Canaan Avalon A16, which leads on 4 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Its biggest concrete edge: 19% better efficacité (17.0 vs 13.8 J/TH). Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 and Canaan Avalon A16 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Canaan Avalon A16 8% more hashrate (260 vs 282 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon A16 12% better power draw (4,420 vs 3,900 W)
- Canaan Avalon A16 19% better efficacité (17.0 vs 13.8 J/TH)
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 13% more heat output (15,081 vs 13,307 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Auradine Teraflux AT2880 | Metric | Canaan Avalon A16 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,202 |
| -$1.26 | Daily net profit | $0.78 |
| -$460 | Net after 1 year | -$3,918 |
| -$920 | Net after 2 years | -$3,633 |
| -$1,380 | Net after 3 years | -$3,349 |
| — | Payback period | Takes ~14.8 years to pay back at current rates |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Canaan Avalon A16$2.04/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon A16Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A1613.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 or the Canaan Avalon A16?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A16 is more profitable at $0.78/day compared to $-1.26/day for the Auradine Teraflux AT2880. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 or the Canaan Avalon A16 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 or the Canaan Avalon A16?
The Canaan Avalon A16 scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AT2880). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Canaan Avalon A16: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Auradine Teraflux AT2880 runs at 17.0 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A16 runs at 13.8 J/TH — a difference of 3.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 19% better efficacité (17.0 vs 13.8 J/TH).
Compare Auradine Teraflux AT2880 with...
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Auradine Teraflux AH3880
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Auradine Teraflux AI3680
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Aisen A1 Pro
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Antminer S17