Canaan Avalon A15-194T vs Canaan Avalon Mini 3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan Avalon A15-194T | Specification | Canaan Avalon Mini 3 |
|---|---|---|
| 194.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 37.5 TH/s |
| 3,647 W | Consommation électrique | 800 W |
| 18.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 21.3 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 33 dB |
| 12.8 kg | Weight | 8.4 kg |
| 12,444 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,730 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan Avalon A15-194T
Canaan Avalon Mini 3
Based on BTC price of $76,751 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Canaan Avalon A15-194T, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 417% more hashrate (194.0 vs 37.5 TH/s) in the Canaan Avalon A15-194T's favour. The Canaan Avalon Mini 3 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Canaan Avalon A15-194T and Canaan Avalon Mini 3 sit on each measurable spec:
- Canaan Avalon A15-194T 417% more hashrate (194.0 vs 37.5 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon Mini 3 78% better power draw (3,647 vs 800 W)
- Canaan Avalon A15-194T 12% better efficacité (18.8 vs 21.3 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon Mini 3 56% better noise (75.0 vs 33.0 dB)
- Canaan Avalon Mini 3 35% better weight (12.8 vs 8.4 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A15-194T 356% more heat output (12,444 vs 2,730 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon Mini 3 117% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Canaan Avalon A15-194T | Metric | Canaan Avalon Mini 3 |
|---|---|---|
| $2,749 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $710 |
| -$1.90 | Daily net profit | -$0.60 |
| -$3,443 | Net after 1 year | -$927 |
| -$4,137 | Net after 2 years | -$1,145 |
| -$4,830 | Net after 3 years | -$1,362 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon Mini 3Score: 65/100. 33 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A15-194T18.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Canaan Avalon A15-194T vs Canaan Avalon Mini 3: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Mini 3 is more profitable at $-0.60/day compared to $-1.90/day for the Canaan Avalon A15-194T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Canaan Avalon A15-194T or the Canaan Avalon Mini 3 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Canaan Avalon Mini 3 is quieter at 33 dB compared to the Canaan Avalon A15-194T at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Canaan Avalon A15-194T or Canaan Avalon Mini 3?
The Canaan Avalon Mini 3 scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Canaan Avalon A15-194T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Canaan Avalon A15-194T and Canaan Avalon Mini 3?
The Canaan Avalon A15-194T runs at 18.8 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon Mini 3 runs at 21.3 J/TH — a difference of 2.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 12% better efficacité (18.8 vs 21.3 J/TH).