Canaan Avalon A16XP vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan Avalon A16XP | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 300.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 81.0 TH/s |
| 3,850 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 12.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 42.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.9 kg | Weight | 12,800.0 kg |
| 13,136 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan Avalon A16XP
Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro
Based on BTC price of $76,988 and current network difficulty as of May 25, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Canaan Avalon A16XP, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 270% more hashrate (300.0 vs 81.0 TH/s). The Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro holds the edge in consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Canaan Avalon A16XP and Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro sit on each measurable spec:
- Canaan Avalon A16XP 270% more hashrate (300.0 vs 81.0 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro 12% better power draw (3,850 vs 3,400 W)
- Canaan Avalon A16XP 69% better efficacité (12.8 vs 42.0 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon A16XP 100% better weight (14.9 vs 12,800.0 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A16XP 13% more heat output (13,136 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon A16XP 36% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Canaan Avalon A16XP | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $4,280 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $404 |
| $1.39 | Daily net profit | -$5.29 |
| -$3,773 | Net after 1 year | -$2,335 |
| -$3,266 | Net after 2 years | -$4,266 |
| -$2,760 | Net after 3 years | -$6,197 |
| Takes ~8.4 years to pay back at current rates | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Canaan Avalon A16XP$6.68/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon A16XPScore: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A16XP12.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Canaan Avalon A16XP or the Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A16XP is more profitable at $1.39/day compared to $-5.29/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Canaan Avalon A16XP or Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro?
The Canaan Avalon A16XP is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Canaan Avalon A16XP or the Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro?
The Canaan Avalon A16XP scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Canaan Avalon A16XP and Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro on J/TH?
The Canaan Avalon A16XP runs at 12.8 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 1166 Pro runs at 42.0 J/TH — a difference of 29.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 69% better efficacité (12.8 vs 42.0 J/TH).