Canaan Avalon A16XP vs MicroBT Whatsminer M61
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan Avalon A16XP | Specification | MicroBT Whatsminer M61 |
|---|---|---|
| 300.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 200.0 TH/s |
| 3,850 W | Consommation électrique | 3,980 W |
| 12.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 19.9 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.9 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 13,136 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 13,580 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan Avalon A16XP
MicroBT Whatsminer M61
Based on BTC price of $76,988 and current network difficulty as of May 25, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan Avalon A16XP comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). The standout gap is 36% better efficacité (12.8 vs 19.9 J/TH) in the Canaan Avalon A16XP's favour. That said, the MicroBT Whatsminer M61 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Canaan Avalon A16XP and MicroBT Whatsminer M61 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Canaan Avalon A16XP 50% more hashrate (300 vs 200 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon A16XP 3% better power draw (3,850 vs 3,980 W)
- Canaan Avalon A16XP 36% better efficacité (12.8 vs 19.9 J/TH)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M61 9% better weight (14.9 vs 13.5 kg)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M61 3% more heat output (13,136 vs 13,580 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Canaan Avalon A16XP | Metric | MicroBT Whatsminer M61 |
|---|---|---|
| $4,280 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,200 |
| $1.39 | Daily net profit | -$2.47 |
| -$3,773 | Net after 1 year | -$3,100 |
| -$3,266 | Net after 2 years | -$4,000 |
| -$2,760 | Net after 3 years | -$4,901 |
| Takes ~8.4 years to pay back at current rates | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Canaan Avalon A16XP$3.85/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A16XP12.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Canaan Avalon A16XP vs MicroBT Whatsminer M61: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A16XP is more profitable at $1.39/day compared to $-2.47/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M61. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Canaan Avalon A16XP vs MicroBT Whatsminer M61: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Canaan Avalon A16XP or the MicroBT Whatsminer M61?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
Canaan Avalon A16XP vs MicroBT Whatsminer M61: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Canaan Avalon A16XP runs at 12.8 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M61 runs at 19.9 J/TH — a difference of 7.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 36% better efficacité (12.8 vs 19.9 J/TH).