iBeLink BM-K1 vs Goldshell KD Box II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-K1 | Specification | Goldshell KD Box II |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 5.0 TH/s |
| 835 W | Consommation électrique | 400 W |
| 157.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 80.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 6,600.0 kg | Weight | 2.0 kg |
| 2,849 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2s | Algorithme | Blake2s |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-K1
Goldshell KD Box II
Based on BTC price of $76,896 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell KD Box II edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 52% better power draw (835 vs 400 W). The iBeLink BM-K1 holds the edge in hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The iBeLink BM-K1 and Goldshell KD Box II diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iBeLink BM-K1 6% more hashrate (5.3 vs 5.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell KD Box II 52% better power draw (835 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell KD Box II 49% better efficacité (157.6 vs 80.0 J/TH)
- Goldshell KD Box II 100% better weight (6,600.0 vs 2.0 kg)
- iBeLink BM-K1 109% more heat output (2,849 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KD Box II 21% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iBeLink BM-K1 | Metric | Goldshell KD Box II |
|---|---|---|
| $9,855 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $236 |
| -$1.82 | Daily net profit | -$0.78 |
| -$10,518 | Net after 1 year | -$522 |
| -$11,181 | Net after 2 years | -$808 |
| -$11,844 | Net after 3 years | -$1,093 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KD Box IIScore: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD Box II80.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iBeLink BM-K1 or Goldshell KD Box II more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD Box II is more profitable at $-0.78/day compared to $-1.82/day for the iBeLink BM-K1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-K1 or Goldshell KD Box II?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
iBeLink BM-K1 vs Goldshell KD Box II: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell KD Box II scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the iBeLink BM-K1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iBeLink BM-K1 vs Goldshell KD Box II: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iBeLink BM-K1 runs at 157.6 J/TH while the Goldshell KD Box II runs at 80.0 J/TH — a difference of 77.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 49% better efficacité (157.6 vs 80.0 J/TH).