iBeLink BM-KS Max vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 11.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 400.0 GH/s |
| 3,400 W | Consommation électrique | 100 W |
| 309.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 12.2 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-KS Max
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 97% better power draw (3,400 vs 100 W). The iBeLink BM-KS Max claws back ground on hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink BM-KS Max and Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra sit on each measurable spec:
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 2650% more hashrate (11.0 vs 0.4 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 97% better power draw (3,400 vs 100 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 19% better efficacité (309 vs 250 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 53% better noise (75.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 80% better weight (12.2 vs 2.5 kg)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 3300% more heat output (11,601 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 97% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| $1,799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $77 |
| -$7.76 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$4,633 | Net after 1 year | -$159 |
| -$7,467 | Net after 2 years | -$242 |
| -$10,301 | Net after 3 years | -$324 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS0 UltraScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iBeLink BM-KS Max vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-7.76/day for the iBeLink BM-KS Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-KS Max or Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the iBeLink BM-KS Max at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
iBeLink BM-KS Max vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the iBeLink BM-KS Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iBeLink BM-KS Max vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max runs at 309.1 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 59.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 19% better efficacité (309 vs 250 J/TH).