iBeLink BM-N3 Max vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-N3 Max | Specification | iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 30.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.8 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 295 W |
| 110.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 163.9 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 6.6 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,007 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-N3 Max
iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)
Based on BTC price of $77,900 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the iBeLink BM-N3 Max comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 1567% more hashrate (30.0 vs 1.8 TH/s) in the iBeLink BM-N3 Max's favour. That said, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iBeLink BM-N3 Max and iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iBeLink BM-N3 Max 1567% more hashrate (30.0 vs 1.8 TH/s)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 91% better power draw (3,300 vs 295 W)
- iBeLink BM-N3 Max 33% better efficacité (110 vs 164 J/TH)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 67% better weight (6.6 vs 2.2 kg)
- iBeLink BM-N3 Max 1019% more heat output (11,260 vs 1,007 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink BM-N3 Max 6% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iBeLink BM-N3 Max | Metric | iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $238 |
| -$6.84 | Daily net profit | -$0.64 |
| -$2,498 | Net after 1 year | -$473 |
| -$4,997 | Net after 2 years | -$708 |
| -$7,495 | Net after 3 years | -$943 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-N3 MaxScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-N3 Max110.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iBeLink BM-N3 Max or the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) is more profitable at $-0.64/day compared to $-6.84/day for the iBeLink BM-N3 Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iBeLink BM-N3 Max or the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The iBeLink BM-N3 Max is quieter at 75 dB compared to the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-N3 Max or the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)?
The iBeLink BM-N3 Max scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 34/100 for the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-N3 Max and iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)?
The iBeLink BM-N3 Max runs at 110.0 J/TH while the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) runs at 163.9 J/TH — a difference of 53.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 33% better efficacité (110 vs 164 J/TH).