Goldshell CK-BOX vs Goldshell CK Box II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell CK-BOX | Specification | Goldshell CK Box II |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.1 TH/s |
| 215 W | Consommation électrique | 400 W |
| 204.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 190.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2,000.0 kg | Weight | 3.0 kg |
| 734 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell CK-BOX
Goldshell CK Box II
Based on BTC price of $77,902 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell CK Box II edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 100% more hashrate (1.1 vs 2.1 TH/s) in the Goldshell CK Box II's favour. That said, the Goldshell CK-BOX isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell CK-BOX and Goldshell CK Box II diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell CK Box II 100% more hashrate (1.1 vs 2.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 46% better power draw (215 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell CK Box II 7% better efficacité (205 vs 190 J/TH)
- Goldshell CK Box II 100% better weight (2,000.0 vs 3.0 kg)
- Goldshell CK Box II 86% more heat output (734 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK Box II 10% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell CK-BOX | Metric | Goldshell CK Box II |
|---|---|---|
| $190 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $246 |
| -$0.48 | Daily net profit | -$0.88 |
| -$365 | Net after 1 year | -$569 |
| -$539 | Net after 2 years | -$892 |
| -$714 | Net after 3 years | -$1,215 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK Box IIScore: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK Box II190.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell CK-BOX vs Goldshell CK Box II: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK-BOX is more profitable at $-0.48/day compared to $-0.88/day for the Goldshell CK Box II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell CK-BOX or Goldshell CK Box II?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Goldshell CK-BOX vs Goldshell CK Box II: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell CK Box II scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell CK-BOX). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell CK-BOX and Goldshell CK Box II?
The Goldshell CK-BOX runs at 204.8 J/TH while the Goldshell CK Box II runs at 190.5 J/TH — a difference of 14.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 7% better efficacité (205 vs 190 J/TH).