Goldshell CK-BOX vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell CK-BOX | Specification | iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.8 TH/s |
| 215 W | Consommation électrique | 295 W |
| 204.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 163.9 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2,000.0 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 734 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,007 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell CK-BOX
iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)
Based on BTC price of $77,900 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 71% more hashrate (1.1 vs 1.8 TH/s) in the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)'s favour. That said, the Goldshell CK-BOX isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell CK-BOX and iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 71% more hashrate (1.1 vs 1.8 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 27% better power draw (215 vs 295 W)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 20% better efficacité (205 vs 164 J/TH)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 100% better weight (2,000.0 vs 2.2 kg)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 37% more heat output (734 vs 1,007 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 10% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell CK-BOX | Metric | iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $190 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $238 |
| -$0.48 | Daily net profit | -$0.64 |
| -$365 | Net after 1 year | -$473 |
| -$539 | Net after 2 years | -$708 |
| -$714 | Net after 3 years | -$943 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)Score: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)163.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell CK-BOX or iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK-BOX is more profitable at $-0.48/day compared to $-0.64/day for the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell CK-BOX vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell CK-BOX or iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)?
The iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell CK-BOX). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell CK-BOX and iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)?
The Goldshell CK-BOX runs at 204.8 J/TH while the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) runs at 163.9 J/TH — a difference of 40.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 20% better efficacité (205 vs 164 J/TH).