Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

VOLCMINER D3

VOLCMINER D3

Taux de hachage 20.0 GH/s Puissance 3,580 W Efficiency 179,000.0 J/TH
VS
Fluminer L1

Fluminer L1

Taux de hachage 5.3 GH/s Puissance 1,200 W Efficiency 226,415.1 J/TH

VOLCMINER D3 vs Fluminer L1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

VOLCMINER D3 Specification Fluminer L1
20.0 GH/s Taux de hachage 5.3 GH/s
3,580 W Consommation électrique 1,200 W
179,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 226,415.1 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit 40 dB
22.0 kg Weight 10.0 kg
12,215 BTU/hr BTU Output 4,094 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 66/100
Release Year
Scrypt Algorithme Scrypt
VOLCMINER Manufacturer FluMiner

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

VOLCMINER D3

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$8.59
Daily Profit -$8.59
Monthly -$257.74
Yearly -$3,135.82

Fluminer L1

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$2.88
Daily Profit -$2.88
Monthly -$86.39
Yearly -$1,051.13

Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

The VOLCMINER D3 and Fluminer L1 finish in a near dead heat in our weighted scoring. There is no wrong answer here — let your electricity rate, noise tolerance and budget break the tie using the breakdowns above.

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the VOLCMINER D3 and Fluminer L1 sit on each measurable spec:

  • VOLCMINER D3 277% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Fluminer L1 66% better power draw (3,580 vs 1,200 W)
  • VOLCMINER D3 21% better efficacité (179,000 vs 226,415 J/TH)
  • Fluminer L1 47% better noise (75.0 vs 40.0 dB)
  • Fluminer L1 55% better weight (22.0 vs 10.0 kg)
  • VOLCMINER D3 198% more heat output (12,215 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
  • Fluminer L1 120% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 66.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

VOLCMINER D3 Metric Fluminer L1
$5,990 Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,452
-$8.59 Daily net profit -$2.88
-$9,126 Net after 1 year -$2,503
-$12,262 Net after 2 years -$3,554
-$15,397 Net after 3 years -$4,605
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Fluminer L1

Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

VOLCMINER D3

179,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

VOLCMINER D3 vs Fluminer L1: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Fluminer L1 is more profitable at $-2.88/day compared to $-8.59/day for the VOLCMINER D3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

VOLCMINER D3 vs Fluminer L1: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Fluminer L1 is quieter at 40 dB compared to the VOLCMINER D3 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the VOLCMINER D3 or Fluminer L1?

The Fluminer L1 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the VOLCMINER D3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

VOLCMINER D3 vs Fluminer L1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The VOLCMINER D3 runs at 179,000.0 J/TH while the Fluminer L1 runs at 226,415.1 J/TH — a difference of 47,415.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 21% better efficacité (179,000 vs 226,415 J/TH).