Goldshell E-KA1M vs Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell E-KA1M | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 4.2 TH/s |
| 1,800 W | Consommation électrique | 500 W |
| 327.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 119.1 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| — | Weight | 4.0 kg |
| 6,142 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 56/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell E-KA1M
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Its biggest concrete edge: 72% better power draw (1,800 vs 500 W). The Goldshell E-KA1M holds the edge in hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell E-KA1M and Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell E-KA1M 31% more hashrate (5.5 vs 4.2 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 72% better power draw (1,800 vs 500 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 64% better efficacité (327 vs 119 J/TH)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 260% more heat output (6,142 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 11% more score de minage domestique (56.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell E-KA1M | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| $910 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $699 |
| -$4.12 | Daily net profit | -$1.05 |
| -$2,415 | Net after 1 year | -$1,082 |
| -$3,919 | Net after 2 years | -$1,465 |
| -$5,424 | Net after 3 years | -$1,847 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS7 LiteScore: 62/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite119.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell E-KA1M vs Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite is more profitable at $-1.05/day compared to $-4.12/day for the Goldshell E-KA1M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell E-KA1M vs Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Goldshell E-KA1M vs Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 56/100 for the Goldshell E-KA1M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell E-KA1M and Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite?
The Goldshell E-KA1M runs at 327.3 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite runs at 119.1 J/TH — a difference of 208.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 64% better efficacité (327 vs 119 J/TH).