Goldshell E-KA1M vs Iceriver KS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell E-KA1M | Specification | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 8.0 TH/s |
| 1,800 W | Consommation électrique | 3,200 W |
| 327.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 400.0 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| — | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 6,142 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 56/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell E-KA1M
Iceriver KS3
Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell E-KA1M, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 44% better power draw (1,800 vs 3,200 W) in the Goldshell E-KA1M's favour. That said, the Iceriver KS3 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell E-KA1M and Iceriver KS3 sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver KS3 45% more hashrate (5.5 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 44% better power draw (1,800 vs 3,200 W)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 18% better efficacité (327 vs 400 J/TH)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 33% better noise (50.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Iceriver KS3 78% more heat output (6,142 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 56% more score de minage domestique (56.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell E-KA1M | Metric | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| $910 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $730 |
| -$4.12 | Daily net profit | -$7.39 |
| -$2,415 | Net after 1 year | -$3,428 |
| -$3,919 | Net after 2 years | -$6,126 |
| -$5,424 | Net after 3 years | -$8,824 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell E-KA1MScore: 56/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell E-KA1M327.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell E-KA1M or Iceriver KS3 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell E-KA1M is more profitable at $-4.12/day compared to $-7.39/day for the Iceriver KS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell E-KA1M vs Iceriver KS3: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell E-KA1M is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Iceriver KS3 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell E-KA1M or Iceriver KS3?
The Goldshell E-KA1M scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell E-KA1M vs Iceriver KS3: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell E-KA1M runs at 327.3 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH — a difference of 72.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 18% better efficacité (327 vs 400 J/TH).