Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Baikal Giant+ A2000

Baikal Giant+ A2000

Taux de hachage 2.0 GH/s Puissance 450 W Efficiency 225,000.0 J/TH
VS
FusionSilicon X7 Miner

FusionSilicon X7 Miner

Taux de hachage 262.0 GH/s Puissance 1,420 W Efficiency 5,419.9 J/TH

Baikal Giant+ A2000 vs FusionSilicon X7 Miner

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Baikal Giant+ A2000 Specification FusionSilicon X7 Miner
2.0 GH/s Taux de hachage 262.0 GH/s
450 W Consommation électrique 1,420 W
225,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 5,419.9 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
2,980.0 kg Weight 4,800.0 kg
1,535 BTU/hr BTU Output 4,845 BTU/hr
34/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
X11 Algorithme X11
Baikal Manufacturer FusionSilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Baikal Giant+ A2000

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.08
Daily Profit -$1.08
Monthly -$32.40
Yearly -$394.17

FusionSilicon X7 Miner

Daily Revenue 0.00000012 BTC $0.01
Daily Electricity -$3.41
Daily Profit -$3.40
Monthly -$101.96
Yearly -$1,240.48

Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the FusionSilicon X7 Miner, which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate). The standout gap is 13000% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.3 TH/s) in the FusionSilicon X7 Miner's favour. That said, the Baikal Giant+ A2000 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: FusionSilicon X7 Miner — l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Baikal Giant+ A2000 and FusionSilicon X7 Miner sit on each measurable spec:

  • FusionSilicon X7 Miner 13000% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.3 TH/s)
  • Baikal Giant+ A2000 68% better power draw (450 vs 1,420 W)
  • FusionSilicon X7 Miner 98% better efficacité (225,000 vs 5,420 J/TH)
  • Baikal Giant+ A2000 38% better weight (2,980 vs 4,800 kg)
  • FusionSilicon X7 Miner 216% more heat output (1,535 vs 4,845 BTU/hr)
  • Baikal Giant+ A2000 10% more score de minage domestique (34.0 vs 31.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Baikal Giant+ A2000

Score: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

FusionSilicon X7 Miner

5,419.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Baikal Giant+ A2000 or FusionSilicon X7 Miner more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal Giant+ A2000 is more profitable at $-1.08/day compared to $-3.40/day for the FusionSilicon X7 Miner. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Baikal Giant+ A2000 or the FusionSilicon X7 Miner better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Baikal Giant+ A2000 vs FusionSilicon X7 Miner: which fits a residential setup better?

The Baikal Giant+ A2000 scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the FusionSilicon X7 Miner). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Baikal Giant+ A2000 and FusionSilicon X7 Miner?

The Baikal Giant+ A2000 runs at 225,000.0 J/TH while the FusionSilicon X7 Miner runs at 5,419.9 J/TH — a difference of 219,580.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 98% better efficacité (225,000 vs 5,420 J/TH).