Goldshell CK-LITE vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell CK-LITE | Specification | iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 6.3 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.8 TH/s |
| 1,200 W | Consommation électrique | 295 W |
| 190.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 163.9 J/TH |
| 65 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 7.5 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 4,094 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,007 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell CK-LITE
iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,184 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell CK-LITE comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 250% more hashrate (6.3 vs 1.8 TH/s). That said, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins efficacité and consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell CK-LITE and iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell CK-LITE 250% more hashrate (6.3 vs 1.8 TH/s)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 75% better power draw (1,200 vs 295 W)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 14% better efficacité (190 vs 164 J/TH)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) 71% better weight (7.5 vs 2.2 kg)
- Goldshell CK-LITE 307% more heat output (4,094 vs 1,007 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK-LITE 53% more score de minage domestique (52.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell CK-LITE | Metric | iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $599 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $238 |
| -$2.65 | Daily net profit | -$0.64 |
| -$1,567 | Net after 1 year | -$473 |
| -$2,536 | Net after 2 years | -$708 |
| -$3,504 | Net after 3 years | -$942 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK-LITEScore: 52/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)163.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell CK-LITE or the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) is more profitable at $-0.64/day compared to $-2.65/day for the Goldshell CK-LITE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell CK-LITE or iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)?
The Goldshell CK-LITE is quieter at 65 dB compared to the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell CK-LITE or iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)?
The Goldshell CK-LITE scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 34/100 for the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell CK-LITE and iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th)?
The Goldshell CK-LITE runs at 190.5 J/TH while the iBeLink N3 mini (1.8Th) runs at 163.9 J/TH — a difference of 26.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 14% better efficacité (190 vs 164 J/TH).