Goldshell KD-BOX Pro vs IceRiver KS3L
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell KD-BOX Pro | Specification | IceRiver KS3L |
|---|---|---|
| 2.6 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 5.0 TH/s |
| 75 W | Consommation électrique | 3,200 W |
| 28.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 640.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 1.1 kg | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 256 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell KD-BOX Pro
IceRiver KS3L
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 98% better power draw (75.0 vs 3,200.0 W) in the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro's favour. That said, the IceRiver KS3L isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro and IceRiver KS3L actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- IceRiver KS3L 92% more hashrate (2.6 vs 5.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 98% better power draw (75.0 vs 3,200.0 W)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 95% better efficacité (28.9 vs 640.0 J/TH)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 53% better noise (35.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 92% better weight (1.1 vs 14.4 kg)
- IceRiver KS3L 4167% more heat output (256 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 97% more score de minage domestique (71.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell KD-BOX Pro | Metric | IceRiver KS3L |
|---|---|---|
| $699 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $7,500 |
| -$0.09 | Daily net profit | -$7.50 |
| -$731 | Net after 1 year | -$10,238 |
| -$762 | Net after 2 years | -$12,975 |
| -$794 | Net after 3 years | -$15,713 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KD-BOX ProScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD-BOX Pro28.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro or IceRiver KS3L more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro is more profitable at $-0.09/day compared to $-7.50/day for the IceRiver KS3L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell KD-BOX Pro vs IceRiver KS3L: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell KD-BOX Pro is quieter at 35 dB compared to the IceRiver KS3L at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell KD-BOX Pro vs IceRiver KS3L: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell KD-BOX Pro scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the IceRiver KS3L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell KD-BOX Pro vs IceRiver KS3L: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell KD-BOX Pro runs at 28.9 J/TH while the IceRiver KS3L runs at 640.0 J/TH — a difference of 611.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 95% better efficacité (28.9 vs 640.0 J/TH).