IceRiver KS0 Pro vs IceRiver KS1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS0 Pro | Specification | IceRiver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| 200.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.0 TH/s |
| 100 W | Consommation électrique | 600 W |
| 500.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 65 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 51/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS0 Pro
IceRiver KS1
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le IceRiver KS0 Pro l'emporte sur 5 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 83% better power draw (100 vs 600 W) in the IceRiver KS0 Pro's favour. The IceRiver KS1 holds the edge in hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the IceRiver KS0 Pro and IceRiver KS1 sit on each measurable spec:
- IceRiver KS1 400% more hashrate (0.2 vs 1.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 83% better power draw (100 vs 600 W)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 17% better efficacité (500 vs 600 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 46% better noise (35.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 83% better weight (2.5 vs 15.0 kg)
- IceRiver KS1 500% more heat output (341 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 39% more score de minage domestique (71.0 vs 51.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| IceRiver KS0 Pro | Metric | IceRiver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| $199 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,500 |
| -$0.23 | Daily net profit | -$1.40 |
| -$284 | Net after 1 year | -$3,012 |
| -$369 | Net after 2 years | -$3,525 |
| -$454 | Net after 3 years | -$4,037 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS0 ProScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS0 Pro500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
IceRiver KS0 Pro vs IceRiver KS1: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS0 Pro is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-1.40/day for the IceRiver KS1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the IceRiver KS0 Pro or the IceRiver KS1 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The IceRiver KS0 Pro is quieter at 35 dB compared to the IceRiver KS1 at 65 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
IceRiver KS0 Pro vs IceRiver KS1: which fits a residential setup better?
The IceRiver KS0 Pro scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 51/100 for the IceRiver KS1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
IceRiver KS0 Pro vs IceRiver KS1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The IceRiver KS0 Pro runs at 500.0 J/TH while the IceRiver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 100.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 17% better efficacité (500 vs 600 J/TH).