IceRiver KS0 vs Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS0 | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 100.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 4.2 TH/s |
| 65 W | Consommation électrique | 500 W |
| 650.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 119.1 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 4.0 kg |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS0
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 4100% more hashrate (0.1 vs 4.2 TH/s). That said, the IceRiver KS0 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the IceRiver KS0 and Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 4100% more hashrate (0.1 vs 4.2 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS0 87% better power draw (65.0 vs 500.0 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 82% better efficacité (650 vs 119 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS0 30% better noise (35.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS0 38% better weight (2.5 vs 4.0 kg)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 669% more heat output (222 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS0 15% more score de minage domestique (71.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| IceRiver KS0 | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| $99 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $699 |
| -$0.15 | Daily net profit | -$1.05 |
| -$155 | Net after 1 year | -$1,082 |
| -$210 | Net after 2 years | -$1,465 |
| -$266 | Net after 3 years | -$1,848 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS0Score: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite119.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the IceRiver KS0 or Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-1.05/day for the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the IceRiver KS0 or Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite?
The IceRiver KS0 is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite at 50 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the IceRiver KS0 or Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite?
The IceRiver KS0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 62/100 for the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
IceRiver KS0 vs Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The IceRiver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite runs at 119.1 J/TH — a difference of 531.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 82% better efficacité (650 vs 119 J/TH).