IceRiver KS1 vs SuperScalar K10
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS1 | Specification | SuperScalar K10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 45.0 GH/s |
| 600 W | Consommation électrique | 1,845 W |
| 600.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 41,000.0 J/TH |
| 65 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 8.3 kg |
| 2,047 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,295 BTU/hr |
| 51/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | SuperScalar |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS1
SuperScalar K10
Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the IceRiver KS1, which leads on 6 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 99% better efficacité (600 vs 41,000 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the IceRiver KS1 and SuperScalar K10 sit on each measurable spec:
- IceRiver KS1 2122% more hashrate (1.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS1 67% better power draw (600 vs 1,845 W)
- IceRiver KS1 99% better efficacité (600 vs 41,000 J/TH)
- SuperScalar K10 45% better weight (15.0 vs 8.3 kg)
- SuperScalar K10 207% more heat output (2,047 vs 6,295 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS1 82% more score de minage domestique (51.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| IceRiver KS1 | Metric | SuperScalar K10 |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,200 |
| -$1.40 | Daily net profit | -$4.43 |
| -$3,012 | Net after 1 year | -$6,816 |
| -$3,525 | Net after 2 years | -$8,431 |
| -$4,037 | Net after 3 years | -$10,047 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS1Score: 51/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS1600.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the IceRiver KS1 or the SuperScalar K10?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS1 is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-4.43/day for the SuperScalar K10. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
IceRiver KS1 vs SuperScalar K10: which runs at a lower noise level?
The IceRiver KS1 is quieter at 65 dB compared to the SuperScalar K10 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the IceRiver KS1 or SuperScalar K10?
The IceRiver KS1 scores 51/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the SuperScalar K10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the IceRiver KS1 and SuperScalar K10 on J/TH?
The IceRiver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH while the SuperScalar K10 runs at 41,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 40,400.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficacité (600 vs 41,000 J/TH).